Filtrează după preț
Brand
- Autogreen 1
- Barum 20
- Bridgestone 263
- Continental 90
- Cooper 1
- Debica 1
- Delinte 2
- Dunlop 2
- Duraturn 1
- Falken 2
- Firestone 98
- fortuna 1
- General 3
- Goodride 2
- Goodyear 66
- Grenlander 1
- Gripmax 1
- Hankook 75
- Hifly 1
- kormoran 2
- Kumho 5
- Landsail 101
- Laufenn 16
- Leao 3
- Linglong 12
- Matador 1
- Maxxis 2
MichelinMichelin 704- Minerva 1
- nankang 1
- Nexen 3
- Nokian 2
- Pirelli 115
- Platin 1
- Radar 1
- Royal-black 1
- Sailun 1
- Sebring 22
- Sunny 1
- Tigar 28
- Tomket 1
- Toyo 1
- Viking 14
- Vredestein 1
- Wanli 1
- Yokohama 2
Diametru
- R17 11
Consum
- Nespecificat 11
Aderenta
- Nespecificat 11
Zgomot Db
- N/A 11
Anvelopa vara LINGLONG BL17 155/70R17 110M
3 in stock
250,99 leiLINGLONG BL17 155/70R17 110M
Anvelopa vara CONTINENTAL S CONTACT 155/70R17 110M
15 in stock
285,81 leiCONTINENTAL S CONTACT 155/70R17 110M
Anvelopa vara KUMHO KH27 215/50R17 91V
2 in stock
370,87 leiKUMHO KH27 215/50R17 91V
Anvelopa vara YOKOHAMA BluEarth-Es ES32 225/45R17 94W
20 in stock
370,91 leiYOKOHAMA BluEarth-Es ES32 225/45R17 94W
Anvelopa vara NANKANG N889 285/70R17 121Q
3 in stock
429,31 leiNANKANG N889 285/70R17 121Q
Anvelopa vara CONTINENTAL ContiSportContact 5 225/45R17 91W
7 in stock
578,59 leiCONTINENTAL ContiSportContact 5 225/45R17 91W
Anvelopa vara NANKANG N889 255/75R17 111/108Q
8 in stock
619,68 leiNANKANG N889 255/75R17 111/108Q
Anvelopa vara NANKANG MT-1 255/75R17 111/108Q
3 in stock
623,82 leiNANKANG MT-1 255/75R17 111/108Q
Anvelopa vara LINGLONG CROSSWIND M/T 265/70R17 121/118Q
3 in stock
691,12 leiLINGLONG CROSSWIND M/T 265/70R17 121/118Q
Anvelopa vara LINGLONG CROSSWIND M/T 285/70R17 121/118Q
7 in stock
698,59 leiLINGLONG CROSSWIND M/T 285/70R17 121/118Q
Anvelopa vara YOKOHAMA GEOLANDAR M/T G003 265/65R17 120/117Q
20 in stock
1.122,38 leiYOKOHAMA GEOLANDAR M/T G003 265/65R17 120/117Q
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.